![]() Sending text message、voice message, starting video and voice call. ![]() The author would like to acknowledge Robbie Fordyce from Monash University and Luke Heemsbergen from Deakin University for their participation in the research project.2. This is how to bring more diversity to newsrooms They can do this by working with local communities to provide credible information on all matters of public interest, not just during the referendum campaign.Īustralia's media has been too white for too long. This means it’s up to public institutions to counter misleading information. On WeChat, misinformation that is not directly linked to Beijing’s political interests tends to fall outside the scope of platform regulators. The government’s bill to curb the online spread of false and misleading information, for instance, does not include non-English-language platforms in its scope. The government also needs to take steps to address the amount of misinformation in the Chinese-language media and social media. More work to do: how Chinese-Australians perceive coverage of themselves and China in Australian media Migrants from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds possess varying levels of literacy regarding Indigenous affairs.Īs a result, Australian public institutions need to craft messages that are not only linguistically accessible, but also adapted to the information consumption habits of migrant communities. The video listed four reasons to vote “no”, which included claims that have been dismissed elsewhere as misinformation, such as concerns over the Voice’s impact on Australia’s “constitutional integrity”, fears of “racial inequality” if the referendum succeeded, and claims it would lead to “Indigenous priviledge”. Compared to most WeChat posts about the referendum, YamiChew’s first video gained significant traction on the platform, with over 10,000 reposts, 1,800 likes and more than 300 comments within 24 hours of its release. The account underwent a notable transformation at the end of September, from posting videos of the family dog to advocating for the “no” campaign. The profile says the owner of the account transitioned from a professional career in Beijing to an immigrant life in Melbourne. One account named YamiChew has published a series of “no” campaign videos. Skepticism towards the Albanese governmentįears the Voice could lead to “racial divide” and “apartheid” in AustraliaĪnd the prevalence of conspiracy theories associated with white supremacy ideologies. The perception taxes could increase due to Labor’s “leftist politics” In our research, we found WeChat users who were leaning towards a “no” vote had many concerns, including:įears the Voice could somehow disempower the Chinese Australian community This translation conveys a sense of emergency and ambiguity to entice WeChat users to click on the link.Ī screenshot of Carina Garland and Mark Dreyfus’s interview. Australia is about to undergo significant changes. For instance, in the screengrab of a WeChat post below, the headline reads:īreaking news! After 24 years, Australia has announced: an immediate mandatory nationwide referendum will be held. We found these media accounts sometimes editorialised the translated English sources to align with readers’ expectations and the accounts’ business imperatives. These posts covered a broad range of topics, including explanations on the scope of the proposed Voice, analysis of Australian public sentiment about the Voice and reports on “yes” and “no” campaign rallies. Many of these posts were translated news reports on the Voice from the English-language media. As a result, commercial media accounts run by Chinese migrants, such as sydtoday, meltoday, AFNDaily, and melvlife, played a pivotal role in shaping these discussions. We were only able to analyse public WeChat accounts, as opposed to private discussions between individuals or in groups. None of the posts had more than 20,000 views – showing how little the debate has resonated with Chinese Australians. Our study used a tool called WeCapture to collect and archive public posts and comments on WeChat related to the referendum.īetween February and September, we collected more than 110 public posts, two short videos and 339 public comments in total. ![]() Among the 339 comments we collected and analysed, the vast majority (about 98.5%) leaned towards voting “no”, while just five comments unequivocally expressed support for the “yes” side.įriday essay: Australia may ban WeChat – but for many Chinese Australians, it's their 'lifeline' Our research found the “no” campaign was resonating much more than “yes” on WeChat, particularly among conservative voices within the community.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |